Sunderland Forum - Original And "Family Friendly"
Join Us If You Support SAFC Or Have Wearside At Heart!
Join Us If You Support SAFC Or Have Wearside At Heart!
Team v Belenenses.
Team v Belenenses.
1. Maclaughlin
2. Maclaughlin
3. Willis.
4. Baldwin.
5. O'nien
6. Embleton
7. Leadbitter
8. Watmore
9. Macquire
10. Wyke
11. Grigg
Subs:-
Loads.
This would be my team considering injuries.
Get ya teams in lads.
2. Maclaughlin
3. Willis.
4. Baldwin.
5. O'nien
6. Embleton
7. Leadbitter
8. Watmore
9. Macquire
10. Wyke
11. Grigg
Subs:-
Loads.
This would be my team considering injuries.
Get ya teams in lads.
- Sunderland Nut
- Freedom of the City
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: 11 Jan 2015, 19:13
- Location: Downhill
- Has thanked: 280 times
- Been thanked: 241 times
- thingamajig
- Freedom of the City
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: 18 Jul 2013, 18:10
- Location: Southwick
- Has thanked: 151 times
- Been thanked: 183 times
Re: Team v Belenenses.
After last season it is a piss poor strike force.
Confidence is one thing but they were bad so if we rely on them again this season we are in trouble IMHO.
What was that you said again?
- Gambling Man
- Local MP
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 16:21
- Location: Grangetown
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Team v Belenenses.
Actual team....
Sunderland AFC XI: J McLaughlin; O'Nien, Willis, Flanagan, C McLaughlin, Hume; McGeouch, Leadbitter, Embleton; Watmore, Grigg
Subs...
All the rest.
Sunderland AFC XI: J McLaughlin; O'Nien, Willis, Flanagan, C McLaughlin, Hume; McGeouch, Leadbitter, Embleton; Watmore, Grigg
Subs...
All the rest.
Re: Team v Belenenses.
HT.
0 - 0
Definitely should be well (2 or 3) in front... Watmore, Grigg and Embleton missing good chances.
0 - 0
Definitely should be well (2 or 3) in front... Watmore, Grigg and Embleton missing good chances.
Re: Team v Belenenses.
1 - 0 down 58 mins... I wouldn't care we've been by far the better side... Embleton has caught the eye... Ganna be a goodun for someone him when Donald cashes in on him.
Re: Team v Belenenses.
FT
1 - 0
A much quieter affair in the second half in terms of chances. A good work out with some typical of an early pre-season sloppy Ness in front of goal. We played a very high line and pressed well up the field for the first hour before a barrage of changes... Better team lost in all fairness. Pleased at the end of the day with the high tempo pressing... Seemed to suit us.
1 - 0
A much quieter affair in the second half in terms of chances. A good work out with some typical of an early pre-season sloppy Ness in front of goal. We played a very high line and pressed well up the field for the first hour before a barrage of changes... Better team lost in all fairness. Pleased at the end of the day with the high tempo pressing... Seemed to suit us.
- Gambling Man
- Local MP
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 16:21
- Location: Grangetown
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Team v Belenenses.
Thanks for the update, I totally forgot about the game tonight.Zook wrote: ↑20 Jul 2019, 21:29 FT
1 - 0
A much quieter affair in the second half in terms of chances. A good work out with some typical of an early pre-season sloppy Ness in front of goal. We played a very high line and pressed well up the field for the first hour before a barrage of changes... Better team lost in all fairness. Pleased at the end of the day with the high tempo pressing... Seemed to suit us.